What legal justification did Officer Wayne likely have for using a Taser on the alleged abuser?

The justification for Officer Wayne's use of a Taser on the alleged abuser can be understood through the principles of use of force in law enforcement. The choice that states Officer Wayne's decision to use force is justified indicates that he had a lawful basis for employing a Taser in that situation.

In law enforcement, the use of force—including non-lethal methods like a Taser—is typically governed by the need to address immediate threats to safety or to prevent harm. If Officer Wayne evaluated the circumstances and determined that the use of a Taser was an appropriate response to the alleged abuser's actions—whether those actions included threatening behavior, potential violence, or resisting arrest—then his decision aligns with both legal standards and departmental policies regarding the use of force.

It’s essential to note that the justification hinges on the reasonableness of the officer's perception of the situation, including the immediacy of the threat and the necessity of using a Taser to ensure the safety of himself, other officers, and the public. This context reinforces the legality of his action during that encounter.